I could also have used a lower bit rate with the AAC file format, because it is more efficient than MP3.
As you may have found, a good quality hi-fi stack and studio monitors can reveal flaws in music files that are inaudible when using a mainstream MP3 player with headphones or earbuds. However, using a higher bit rate should mean that when I buy better equipment -– such as a high-end MP3 player – it won't expose problems that were masked before.
#Best cd to flac converter 320kbps
I could have used a lower bit rate than 320kbps (actually VBR: variable bit rate), and I can't reliably hear the difference between lossless and 196kbps MP3 files. It's the closest thing we have to a universal music format. (Unfortunately, both Apple and Microsoft have their own lossless formats.) The MP3 codec, by contrast, delivers smaller files that almost every device – PC, phone, MP3 player, CD player etc – can play. I chose the second option, and encoded tracks in 320kbps MP3.įLAC captures all the information in the recording, but it has two significant disadvantages: it produces large files, and not all portable music players can handle it. The second is to make a copy that is so good that you will never be able to hear the difference. The first is to make a perfect copy using a lossless system such as FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec). You wrote in another column: 'My preferred strategy for scanning things (or ripping CDs), is to do the job so well that it never has to be done again.' Please could you share your thoughts on the best way to do this?Ĭonverting or "ripping" an audio CD into a digital file is a time-consuming process, and there are at least two sensible options.
0 kommentar(er)
